Archive | September, 2008

Blog This!: Maher Snaps on White Welfare Pimps

30 Sep

Yeah, I haven’t been up on it since this weekend.  But between Biblical Greek and playing for late-night services and rehearsals, blogging is somewhat taking a back seat. 

But the following clip was sent by a FAITHFUL reader, who I know in person, we’ll just call her Uppity Prof for now, and this is to tide you all over until my next entry, which at this point may be the Live blogging I’m going to try and do for this vice-presidential debates between Gov. Sarah “The Moose” Palin and Sen. Joe “The Mullet” Biden.

Enjoy!

I hope you all got his point.

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

The Presidential Debates Debrief

28 Sep

First, thanks to the commenters again who tuned in and commented during the Live Blog I did on the presidential debates on last Friday night.  And for interested parties, I believe I killed in my own debates in Church History class on Saturday morning; we were arguing if “The Trinity Doctrine is nonsense. Arianism isn’t so bad.”

What side do you think I argued on?

Also, I’m giving a birthday shoutout to Mama Uppity who’s celebrating her 62nd birthday on this planet called earth!

Now, to the debates.

First, I just want to say I got mad at the networks all over again because they pushed Donna “Press and curls fit me” Brazile all the way to the end like 25 minutes into the post-debate talks.  And then that did nothing but further remind me that “us folk” are quite paltry when it comes to being on the networks for true real commentary.

But, anywho…

I thought the debate started off well and went quickly downhill.  I think that was evident in my live blog because I remember more than once I wrote “I’m bored.”  As the CNN commentators said, there was no “Youtube” moment in the entire debate which was quite true.  I also thought it was an unfair criticism of the commentators that none of them drove home the critical nature of the economy.   Well, there was a mid-air shift in the questions because this was orginally supposed to be the “foreign affairs” debate.

And yes, if you can’t name drop and pronounce the name, or get the name right, just keep it to yourself.

I think most everyone agrees, though, that there was no standout moment for either candidate except Sen. Barack Obama turning and facing Sen. John “My name is Jim” McCain and Obama’s “John, I have a bracelet too.”   I must admit everyone I knew thought that was a hoot.  Folks started posting that on their Facebook status message it was that funny. 

Personally, I wasn’t swayed either way as to who came into the debates having to prove themselves more.  If it wasn’t for the stunt Fool Fest pulled earlier last week, I would have said Obama’s lackluster or should I say milquetoast debates in the primaries, not to mention his Saddleback sandbagging forum with Rick Warren, would have put him at a disadvantage.  But, I think the two went into this debate with an equal amount of debits and credits to their name, and sadly, they left at about the same level.

I wish the campaign operatives would just have told the truth and said this ddebate was a draw.  As I’ve already said, there was no stand out moment on any issue.  There was no extremely entertaining moment in the debate either.  Oh, yeah, the talking heads were saying they didn’t know what to make of this “John, you’re right” refrain Obama kept echoing the whole night.

Here’s the first one in response to the back and forth about “fundamental” differences between how each, as president would lead the country out of the financial crisis:

Well, I think Senator McCain’s absolutely right that we need more responsibility, but we need it not just when there’s a crisis. I mean, we’ve had years in which the reigning economic ideology has been what’s good for Wall Street, but not what’s good for Main Street.

Well, Senator McCain is absolutely right that the earmarks process has been abused, which is why I suspended any requests for my home state, whether it was for senior centers or what have you, until we cleaned it up.

And he’s also right that oftentimes lobbyists and special interests are the ones that are introducing these kinds of requests, although that wasn’t the case with me.

But let’s be clear: Earmarks account for $18 billion in last year’s budget. Senator McCain is proposing — and this is a fundamental difference between us — $300 billion in tax cuts to some of the wealthiest corporations and individuals in the country, $300 billion. [Emphasis added.]

Now, $18 billion is important; $300 billion is really important.

And in his tax plan, you would have CEOs of Fortune 500 companies getting an average of $700,000 in reduced taxes, while leaving 100 million Americans out.

So my attitude is, we’ve got to grow the economy from the bottom up. What I’ve called for is a tax cut for 95 percent of working families, 95 percent.

And that means that the ordinary American out there who’s collecting a paycheck every day, they’ve got a little extra money to be able to buy a computer for their kid, to fill up on this gas that is killing them.

And over time, that, I think, is going to be a better recipe for economic growth than the — the policies of President Bush that John McCain wants to — wants to follow

Here’s the second one in which he acknowledged John McCain being right when the issue of tax codes were brought up.  Also, at this point, let it be known, Obama had stuck it to McCain twice, a point that Lehrer had brought up:

My definition — here’s what I can tell the American people: 95 percent of you will get a tax cut. And if you make less than $250,000, less than a quarter-million dollars a year, then you will not see one dime’s worth of tax increase.

Now, John mentioned the fact that business taxes on paper are high in this country, and he’s absolutely right. Here’s the problem: There are so many loopholes that have been written into the tax code, oftentimes with support of Senator McCain, that we actually see our businesses pay effectively one of the lowest tax rates in the world.

And what that means, then, is that there are people out there who are working every day, who are not getting a tax cut, and you want to give them more.

It’s not like you want to close the loopholes. You just want to add an additional tax cut over the loopholes. And that’s a problem.

Just one last point I want to make, since Senator McCain talked about providing a $5,000 health credit. Now, what he doesn’t tell you is that he intends to, for the first time in history, tax health benefits.

So you may end up getting a $5,000 tax credit. Here’s the only problem: Your employer now has to pay taxes on the health care that you’re getting from your employer. And if you end up losing your health care from your employer, you’ve got to go out on the open market and try to buy it.

It is not a good deal for the American people. But it’s an example of this notion that the market can always solve everything and that the less regulation we have, the better off we’re going to be.

It’s time’s like these when I wish I had been a journalism major, because I think we see way too much sloppy journalism and just outright laziness because anyone with a brain can read these transcripts and see that this was Obama taking in the fine points of communication: you agree with your opponent, cordially and that softens the blow.   That’s him “reaching across the aisle” and not him really aligning himself with Republican ideals as the commentators tossed up.  After each agreement, Obama would go in for the kill.

McCain and Lehrer knew that.  Why else you think McCain’s 5’9″ @$$ never looked at Obama directly.

Well, that’s my take on the debates, what did you think?

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

LIVE Blogging of the Presidential Debates

26 Sep

errgh...these first pics suck. I'll update later.

Errgh, I’m sooooo running late.

9:11pm

I walked into my friend’s rooom and I could smell the fried fish that I’m eating as I type and greasing up my keyboard.  Omg, did John McCain just up and say his condolences are into Sen. Ted Kennedy for being in the hospital.

My friend Texas Uppity informed me that they had JUST made the statement that Kennedy had been released from the hospital. 

Oh yeah, my other friend Macon It Uppity (aha, play on words) said “Hush, it’s on.”

So far, Obama’s doing well, I think he answed the $700 billion question right.

9:15pm

Q: Are ther fundamental difference between the candidates economic plan?

“I have a pen and I will…the pen’s kinda old…” LIKE YOUR OLD ASS IS!!

9:24pm

HaHAHA Jim Lehrer got McCain together.  He told him, “Well, he’s come for you wice, I want you to respond to him.”  Because clerly McCain’s tax plan is really more for the rich and Obama’s tax cut is for those who are making less than $250K.  Sadly, however, small business taxes are going to go up under Obama’s plan.  But that’s apparently the Republican understanding.

Clearly, Obama found some intestinal fortitude.  So far I’m liking this Obama.

McCain: “I don’t want to go back and forth…”
Macon It Uppity: “IT’S A DEBATE!  YOU SUPPOSED TO GO BACK AND FORTH!”

And John, come on now, lets not talk about votes, when your ass voted for the Iraq war and you’re debating the only one who didn’t!

9:27pm

I need a commercial break–I’m thirsty.  I didn’t know this was a no interruption thingy.

Q: What will you have to give up in terms of spending?

Alright, Obama said….oops I missed it. I was checking my phone.  Third thing, Obama, make sure we’re competing in education.  Wtf? Does that have to do with the question!?  I’m confused B’Orama.  Alright, infrastructure, I’m for that.  So, is going to give that stuff up.  I’m lost.

Okay, let’s see what McCain says:

“No matter what, we’ve got to cut spending.”  DUH!  Tell me something I don’t know.  Eliminate ethanol, umkay.

Lehrer got them RIGHT together, they’re saying that they really don’t wanna give up much.  See, here’s my first tangent.  We live in a society where jokers don’t wanna pay for the ish that they have.  I mean…

wait, “McCain accused me of being very liberal, but that’s really me just opposing George Bush’s plans.”  just had to get that in there, lol.  And then Lehrer cut off McCain who wanted to rebutt.

I’m back.

…I mean, come on now, the only way we can keep spending at this rate and not cut anything is to raise taxes?  I don’t get this.

9:33pm

I’m convinced Obama’s been waiting for this for a while.  He was like this joker is NOT about to show him up because he’s killing with the one liners.  McCain said he wanted to do a spending freeze and Obama said “that’s using a hatchet when you need to use a scalpel”

9:42pm

Yeessssssssssssss, Iraq War!  Obama said lemme speak from the first as far as the lessons learned.  He said let it be known I voted against it.  Meh, he still was a bit professorial.  What he said at the end should have been his opening statement after he said I voted against it before.

HOLLUP!!

What was the controls and what were the variables about this effing surge!?!?!  How do we know the surge aint work!?!?!  900 days without going to Iraq.  But how do we know the violence went down because of the surge?!?!  I need help church!

HA!  He said I’m proud of my selection of vice presidential pick!

9:46pm

I think Obama’s ability to say the question really is “Who’s able as president to handle the Iraq war?” The ability to redefine the question I think shows some leadership and make the conversation revolve around you.  Something McCain tried, but he didnt do well at with this political stunt he pulled earlier this week.

9:49pm

Obama said within 16 months we should be out? Do You think that within 16 months we should or could withdraw from Iraq?  Should we focus troops on Afghanistan?  Why haven’t we caught Osama Bin Laden?

Sorry, McCain, I’m not convinced that we’ll have a wider war.

9:54pm

Got a quiet crowd over here and I’m ready for them to move on to a new topic.  I’ve already said my piece about the ish going on in the Middle East.

9:58pm

So, this is the McCain strategy to talk about what you’ve already done.  I guess that makes sense because it’s dictating what’s ur historic line of reasoning.  I can buy this.  That record is nice beginning back in 1983 with Ronald Reagan.

Blah
Blah
Blah!

10:00pm

Obama was ready!  “I got a bracelet too!”  He also said he’s not going to “muddle through.”  Wait, hollup McCain, Obama didn’t go to Iraq and when he did, y’all damn near set him up and then called him a celebrity when he did!!!!!  Oh come off it aint no one buying this bull-ish!

10:03pm

Jim Lehrer: “What is your reading on the threat from Iran?”

McCain: Thinks did I take my Ginko Biloba because CLEARLY his ass aint know what Lehrer said cuz he said “What is….ummm…my reading…on the threat from Iran….” and then it kicked in.

10:07pm

Let the record show Obama is against Iran having nuclear arms!  And would amp up an arms race in the middle East.  He believes in tough diplomacy.  THANK YOU!  Not talkin to muh’fuggas has NOT worked.  This in addition to tougher sanctions.

Oh, here we go.

McCain is against…

HAHAHAHA!!  He butchered Mahmoud Ahmadenejad’s name, po’babyb

…against talking to the people.  I still don’t know where I stand on the non-conditional vs. pre-conditional meetings.  What do you think?  Should Obama meet with these leaders with conditions or without conditions or do you think he should meet them in the first place?

OH WOW!  He’s killing!  He just said Henry Kissenger said the same thing!  I need a FACT CHECK!!  But I’m live blogging, can someone follow up on that for me!

Oh wow!  Obama’s said Bush sent someone over to talk–McCain is looking a FOOOOOOOL!

10:09pm

Did he really say that height plays that big of a role in the wider scheme of things?  I guess nut.  For the record, McCain had a good come back: “Well, I’m not about to set the White House meeting schedule before I’m elected…”

Kudos to McCain.

Uh-oh, McCain’s turning the heat up.  He said Kissenger is my friend of 35 years–am I the only person who is mildly concerned.

10:16

Q: How do you see Russia?

Well, so far so good.  Their fling with Georgia was outta order.  He said if they want to be a 21st century, they need to not act like it’s the 20th century.

McCain said it was naivete for him to say “both sides should show restraint.”  McCain said he was looking into his eyes!?!?!?  WTF!?!?! Sounds like witchcraft to me—SEEEEE!!  He and Palin are in BED together with the witchcraft Pentecostals!

Sorry, McCain bores me when he talks!

10:21

UPDATE!!!  MCCAIN’S Centrum daily vitamins kick in!  He magically started pronouncing names right.

Seriously, am I the only one who’s not just riveted by the topics of tonight?

10:26pm

What is this!?!?!?  I’m siding with AB on this one, Obama clearly took a crash course from Rebb’n Al because Obama is KILLING with these comebacks.  Clearly since this summer, his debate skills have gone through the ROOF!

10:27pm

Ragin Uppity walks in hella late….I mean damn, the debate over…wtf!?!?!  he said he don’t like the name, oh hell, that’s what I’m sticking with.  How much you wanna bet he gon wanna say something but aint watched the debate.

BE INFORMED!!

But you still cool with us Ragin Uppity  you can read the live blog and catch up!

10:28pm

Sorry, I could care less if there’s a likelihood of another attack.  I think they could have talked about oil in the context of foreign policies and I woulda been more involved.

10:31pm

**waiting for the press to upload pics so I can put a big ol picture at the top of this blog**

10:34pm

And wow, I’ma really need for the effing POW to effin’ deal with Veterans of this country!  I’m really not convinced that they think he’s going to take care of them.  Ragin Uppity is over there shaking his head and Macon It Uppity sings the ….

Duh Obama, we know you get your name from your father–and him coming over here.

…sings the refrain to “Leaning on the Everlasting Arms” singing “Saaaafe and secuuuuuure frommmm alll alonnnnng…”

10:37

ANNNNND THAAAAAT’S IT! 

Stay tuned to following blogs for me to fully digest this, what I considered mediocre questioning of the debates.  I think the questions started high and went down from there as far as wide reaching emotions.  Oh wow, there’s some fact checks coming.

Thanks to the commenters who kept up with the Live blogging, and make sure to stay tuned tomorrow (after my own debates and class) and you’ll see what I really had to say.  I guess you can always go to CNN in the meantime.

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

UNN News Alert: Live Blogging @ 9pm Eastern of the First Presidential Debates, 2008

26 Sep

CLICK HERE FOR LIVE BLOG FEED!!!!

Hmm, I got invited to an impromptu Debate Party and they have an internet signal, so I’m going to forego studying for my own debates tomorrow and just pull an all-nighter and crash around 3pm Saturday just so I can try this.

We’re gonna try this and if you’re sitting next to your computer during the debates, keep it tuned to the UNN and keep it live and locked.  It’ll be a live update with each and every turn of the debate.

CLICK HERE FOR LIVE BLOG FEED!!!!

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

UNN Late(r) Breaking News: McCain Shows Signs of Schizophrenia as he heads to Mississippi for the Debates

26 Sep

Em-Eye Crooked Letter Crooked Letter, Eye, Crooked Letter Crooked Letter, Eye, Humpback Humpback, Eye

Did I spell it right?

Personally, I’m still a bit shocked that we’re hearing the two weirdest states on the news all the time.  I mean who, in 100 years would have thought that Alaska and Mississippi would have been at the center of political news for a sustained period of time.  I remember even during the Democratic Primaries that it was weird as CNN was hoping across the country following the primaries to actually hear the name Mississippi and to see people do live shots from random towns in Mississippi of all places.

And then came Alaska–I mean, Wasilla!?!?!?

I guess…

**scratches my head**

I think it really shows some weirdness on Sen. John McCain’s part because, come on, did you really think you were gonna get out of this?  I mean you gave a good try–a REAL good try.  I must tip my hat to the machination of this scheme, but get out of the first debate and then try and postpone the VP debates in it’s place? 

Now McCain looks like a tottering Old Fool (as if he didn’t before) with him going back and forth.  What did he really accomplish going to Washington, DC–not a DAMN thing.  So, he left on Wednesday and according to all reports, he didn’t contribute to the talks yesterday on Thursday and then early this morning he was in Virginia and then by the 11 o’clock hour had let it be known he was headed to Oggsford Oxford for this evening.  To say that enough progress has been made, ergo, I can now go to the debates, is the DUMBEST thing uttered this campaign.  He must really think we’re idiots.

Here’s why:

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid lit into McCain this morning in the 11am press conference and was talking like a Republican.  I mean he was quite clear that the injection of presidential politics did not help them in this process. 

The insertion of presidential politics has not been helpful. It’s been harmful … A few days ago I called on Senator McCain to take a stand, let us know where he stands on this issue … But all he has done is stand in front of the cameras. We still don’t know where he stands on the issue.”

So essentially he was saying the Old Fool was grandstanding in rare form.

That being said, I wonder how much preparation did John McCain get before going tete-a-tete with Sen. Barack Obama tonight?  I pray that Obama’s been rehearsing for this for some time now.  I wonder if McCain neglected to practice in lieu of this political stunt that has clearly backfired. 

OMG…

Of course I tuned into “The View” this morning flipping between what crazy thing Elisabeth “Miz Liz” Hasselbeck was going to say.  And she got my blood pressure up, of course.  Even though it was previously recorded show and they didn’t have the benefit of the stupidity of the last two days, but it still just pissed me off at the incessant stupidity of Miz Liz.  I wonder is she an average white woman in her thoughts.

If I can go off on a tangent momentarily…

We in this country seriously play the identity politics and we have it down to a fine art.  We hearken back to the ideal of an Andrew “I owned slaves and was damn proud of it” Jackson (our 7th president) and Abraham “I really don’t want to free the slaves” Lincoln who had this real “down home” feel to them because they don’t come from nobility.  Clearly in this case the most wealthy guy running is John McCain, but yet and still because of Sarah “THE MOOSE” Palin, many Americans are identifying with the Republican party as though these people have their best interest at heart–and then at the same time misidentifying the Democrat ticket.

Can I park it right here for a minute?

Seriously, the Obama Waffles bit was such a sham of politics in this country it’s just sad.  There’s a video of the two creators who try to explain the reason why Obama had on a Muslim headwrap in the caricature and they’re trying their best to not come of as snide idiots, but it doesn’t work well at all.  The reporter pushes the envelope when he asks “Well you know he’s a member of the United Church of Christ?” and one of the jackasses says “So he says.”

WHAT!?!?!

Yes people, this is the type of stupidity we’re dealing with.  At this point, after the Jeremiah “I’ve really gone into hiding” Wright controversy I’m convinced that certain Republican operatives are using this stuff as a wedge issue because they can get away with it.  Sadly, it influences many swing voters, which is just a euphemism for “average white voters.” 

Seriously people, what black person do you know who doesn’t know who they’re voting for.

Okay, end of tangent.

What did McCain really accomplish going up to Washington?  Not a doggone thing!  I just hope the dude doesn’t dodge any questions tonight and I hope Obama is prepared to answer questions about William Ayers, because that’s about Obama’s only Achilles’ Heel about now.

So are you able to see through this smoke and mirrors that McCain has put up to get out the debates?  Do you really think that he accomplished something by going up to Washington?  I mean, is there ANYTHING that he did that clearly has his fingerprints on it that history can point to and say, if John McCain hadn’t been there then x,y,z wouldn’t have happened.  What are you expecting from the debates?  If you had one question you wanted to ask the candidates, what would it be? (“Senator McCain, would you or have you ever eaten Obama Waffles brand waffle mix?)

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

Is McCain’s Failure to Debate His First Signs of Dementia?

24 Sep

Prolly be a short post, but still, it was worthy of another one.

So Sen. Barack Obama came out and said what I wanted him to. 

This is exactly the time when the American people need to hear from the person who in approximately 40 days will be responsible for dealing with this mess,” Obama told reporters in Clearwater, Fla.  “In my mind, it’s more important than ever that we present ourselves to the American people and describe where we want to take the country and where we want to take the economy.”

Seriously, did Sen. John McCain think he wielded that much power that the opposing team was all of a sudden going to start playing the game his way?  These next few days are going to be interesting because as of now, the University of Mississippi is prepared to go forward with the debates, and clearly Obama is like “Bring it on!” 

This is, to quote Sen. Barney Frank is such a big Hail Mary pass it’s not even funny.  It feels as though McCain has nutted early and he’s scrambling right about now.  Yes, it’s a few more weeks left and a lot can happen on both sides, but this is a mess on McCain’s part.  It really comes off as the piddlings of an old man who’s trying maintain the rest of his life.

In addition to Gov. Sarah Palin being trotted around the United Nations today and they suceeded in only making her look like a pitbull wearing lipstick and kept on a short leash.  The LA Times in a pretty slanted article wrote that

The candidate’s staff carefully choreographed her debut onto the international stage, starting each meeting with a brief photo opportunity and allowing no questions. Unscripted moments were kept to a minimum.
At first, the campaign wanted to keep reporters out altogether. But after the five major television networks threatened to boycott coverage of the Palin meetings, a pool that included a print journalist eventually was allowed in.

Today was just not a good image day for McCain in my opinion.  He could have and should have done much better.  His proposal as it stands now is to postpone the debates until October 2nd, which as everyone knows was the scheduled debate day for the vice-presidential debates in St. Louis.   See y’all can’t be fooled by this man.  He went on to say that the VP debates would be postponed ’till a later date–RIIIIIIIIIIIGHT, to give Caribou Barbie as much time as possible.

If anyone thinks McCain is doing this out of the goodness of his heart, you’re sadly mistaken and are prolly a Republican beyond repair, so I’m really not talking to you.  But for the rest of you fools, just think about this critically.  He should be able to do both: campaign and talk about the economy at the same time.  Aint no one held a gun to his head and ask him to be a U.S. Senator and run for the presidency at the same time. 

And even if he does suspend the campaign, to weasel out of the debates is just low.  Come on now!  You’ve been hollering for town hall meetings for the longest, McCain should be chomping at the bit to go at Obama on debates.  Hell, everyone knows Obama sucks at debates, why is he backing out now?

Questions, questions, questions….

Has anyone’s opinion of Obama or McCain shifted because of this recent bout in politicking politricking?

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

UNN to Obama: Tell that Mental (Case) McCain “Hell Naw I aint suspending my campaign!”

24 Sep

I think Sen. Barack Obama should follow that statement with a pithy “Just because yo’ @$$ aint prepared for the debates on Friday is NOT an excuse to ‘suspend’ your campaign.”

I mean wow! 

Wow!

I’ve never been one to subscribe to the much used moniker of “politricks” in my blogs, I’ve usually just chalked it up to good ole politicking, but this is one for the books.  I must say it’s a pretty smart move, putting Obama on the hot seat.  As of the publishing of this post, Obama has not responded, but I mean McCain’s idea of calling off the campaign to act like they’re actually members of Congress is pretty novel, I must say so myself.

But the quote from the CNN article that

Republican presidential candidate John McCain announced Wednesday that he is suspending his campaign to return to Washington and focus on the “historic” crisis facing the U.S. economy

is slightly overstating this in my opinion.

Here, let me tell you why.

First of all, it’s been a “historical crisis” for black folk since 1877 and Reconstruction was over.  That’s just issue number one in the black community.  And to borrow from Claire Huxtable’s comment on the news show “Retrospective” when they asked her about blacks during the Great Depression, “We learned that misery does not love company.”  And I think that’s really what this shows with McCain’s response.

Aside from clearly, his inability to speak about the economy in well enough terms, (because Ali Velshi on CNN looked like he was trying not to bust out laughing when he said given the income of tax plans balanced against the energy, infrastructure and health care plans that both candidates are proposing that ultimately Obama’s plan would cost $14 billion compared to McCain’s plan of $302 billion) has resulted in him trying to get out the debates, this is only a damn historical crisis cuz rich folk and white collar folk are affected.

Yeah, I said it–rich folk and white collar folk are affected.

You knew rich folk were being affected when Pat Buchanan got his butt on TV and allegedly said that this recession could be partly in blame because of “minority loans.”   Notwithstanding the scary Libertarian brand of conservatism touted by Buchanan, I think this further shows the gap between McCain and the middle class man.  From the start of the campaign, we’ve kinda been in a slump.  It wasn’t until this slump hit Wall Street that folks wanted to make a big stink about it, but Main Street has been feeling the hit for quite some time now.  Ask the mayor of any major city just how they’re balancing budgets, let alone ask the small town mayor’s of rural America (including Wasilla, AK where they went in debt for that rec center).

I’m writing this as Obama speaks in a downstair computer lab, and not near a computer.

I hope I’ll hear that Obama tells him no, and that the best way to affect change is to get away from the Washingtonian politics and go out on the campaign trail and listen to what the voters have to say.  In turn, the best platform where they can speak on message about what they plan to do is during the debates.  There will no doubt be a record number of people watching them and both candidates will have the full rapt attention of the American public.  This as opposed to the backroom dealings of Capitol Hill where often times the hearings are only covered partially by the cable networks, and let’s face it, it’s a small minority of us who watch C-SPAN like that.

So, we shall see just how this turns out.

Per Obama’s response, and my POV, what do you think Obama’s response should have been/was? And do you think McCain is just suffering from a serious case of anxiety after the Washington Post’s poll (despite Hannity on his radio program alleging that they doubled polled African Americans) and is realising that he can’t multitask as well as purported?

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

UNN Movie Review: This Movie ‘Preys’ Upon Old American Themes

24 Sep

**SPOILER ALERT**

Well, I liked the movie until we left and went out to eat.

I guess that’s what happens when you go to the movie with a licensed and practicing psychologist.

Aside from the baptismal scene of Tyler Perry’s latest break into Hollywood, I had really thought the movie was a good, borderline great movie.  It had great oneliners “He’s a Cartwright!” and “It’s sisters like you that give us all a bad name” and I could go on, but I don’t want to TOTALLY ruin it for you all.  It was good to see Robin Givens finally play what amounted to a decent black woman in a movie after always playing a bitch and having her character relish in the bitch status.

But then when went to go eat.

And through the conversation, it dawned on us that this was almost a basic slave narrative.   Lemme break it down to ya like a fraction.

1. The white master was sleeping with the black slave and subsequently had a kid by the black slave, that in many respects was raised by the slave community.  Clearly Sanaa Lathan’s character wasn’t all that interested with her husband, let alone her son.

Um, if I can park here parenthetically…

Black women always hollering about there are no good black men, and blah blah blah.  One of the reasons suggested to me was that too often black men have this ideal of white women as the epitome of beauty and therefore are passing the sisters by.  Let’s review this, what is the black woman’s ideal of beauty?  Cole Hauser or Wentworth Miller?   I’m not trying to turn this into a color thing, because clearly, that seems to be the most visited post on this blog, even though I did that blog back in like April, but maybe this whole idea of beauty needs to go both ways–I’m just saying.  Also, let the record show that Alfre Woodard is married to a white guy and Sanaa Lathan in her last, somewhat flop of a movie, called “Something New” was all about her falling in love with a white guy.

I’m done parenthetically speaking.

Seriously guys, what was the character motivation for William Cartwright to do what he did?  Meh, dare I say white privilege?!?! LMAO.  No, I’m not suggesting that, but it does reek of the slave owner having his way with the slave women, and the black men and husband not being able to stop it–or in this case, totally unaware of it.

2.  The ultimate emasculation of the black man by the slave owner.  Come on now, sleeping with the man’s wife after offering him a job just totally emasculates the man and he doesn’t even know his testicles are getting cut off.  We all knew something was up from jump even before the wedding, and definitely at the wedding when William looks at Andrea and bites his lip.

And if I can parenthetically park again,

Why is it that Andrea just tore down her husband so viciously?  It was brutal, and like an emasculated man he just took it, and took it and took it until he slapped the piss outta her.  (I wish it wasn’t him who had slapped her, but she needed to be slapped nonetheless.)  She even referred to him as “some gentleman” at the gala.

3. The white mistress befriending the black mammy.  Personally I think there was much more of a friendship there than possibly what took place in a slave situation, but nonetheless Charlotte and Alice’s relationship does hearken back to a slave-slaveowner relationship.  Just look at “Gone With the Wind” and look at Mammy’s character who was considered the “real head of the household.”  Clearly Alfre Woodard was instrumental in holding both families together.

The following are other general observations, seeing as how they fall outside the typical slave narrative portrayed above:

4.  There was the underlying gratuitous sexual nature of the movie that manifested itself in some uncomfortable ways.  Robin Givens character would NOT have been showing all of that cleavage in the work place.  Personally, I was somewhat distracted in the first board room scene where the battle lines were drawn between Given’s character and Hauser’s character.  Also there was a shot coming from a male, that uncomfortably had a bulge in his pants, and that was the cinematographical choice of the director to film from that angle as Charlotte and Alice climbed out of the car to walk to the creek to get her baptized (and I just wanna know did the preacher do it in the name of “Jesus Christ” or in the name of the “Father, Son and Holy Ghost.”)

Not to mention that Rockmond Dunbar’s character had a clear infatuation with Tyler Perry’s character.  We surmised at the table that it was a result of Chris not having a real relationship at home with his own wife.  Others said there was some underlying homosexual tension on Chris’ part, but I didn’t quite see that, but again we’re going to school in Atlanta and our understandings of sexuality have been so skewed it’s not even funny.

5.  I still think that Tyler Perry did a good job with this movie.  It was nice to see some more A-list actors in his movies.  I’m still just waiting on him to snag Denzel in one of his movies and then Tyler will officially have “made it” in that sense.  I was quite moved by this movie on all levels and thankfully, there weren’t any jumps of reality that I felt I had to make, which usually I feel I do.  For example in “Why Did I Get Married”  I just didn’t really see the feasibility of a single woman driving from Atlanta to Colorado by herself, and I also think there was an issue of time in that: that’s like a 24 drive, and they never showed her spending the night once or being wholly exhausted when she showed up.

I thought this time, he kept the melodrama to himself.  I didn’t see once scene where it was just over the top acting.  But, again, this time, he’s sharpened his own acting skills and all the people in this movie have been in Hollywood for quite sometime now and have solidified themselves as real actors.

******************************

In unrelated movies…

Per the previews, I’m looking forward to “Lakewood Terrace” to watch Samuel “I Never Turn Down a Script EVAR” L. Jackson act a COMPLETE fool–aint he always playing some crazy ass man?  Also, there was the “The Secret Life of Bees” starring Queen Latifah, Alicia Keys and solidfying the look of Jennifer Hudson really being from the South Side of the Chi.  If it wasn’t for Dakota Fanning who for some reason just irks the crap outta me, I’d be hella hyped about this movie.  But I’m sure I’ll go see it anywayz.

Do you think Tyler’s movie are supposed to have life imitating art or art imitating reality?  Because no one can deny that this movie is more or less believable, but does he, or anyone else, have a responsibility to show archetypical movies as opposed to stereotypical movies?

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

We Have Work To Do: Only 24% of Whites View Blacks as Friendly

22 Sep

 

This above graph was sobering for a Saturday morning when I first saw the story as I opened up my computer and saw the premier news story on Sen. Barack Obama  that was entitled “Racial views steer some white Dems away from Obama” from the AP/Yahoo News source.

Of course, white Republicans were a far gone conclusion, but it just dawned on me why we have the problems that we have in this country: Blacks are doomed from the start in the eyes of many white folks–even the good white liberals!  Seriously, if Obama is coming under fire, a Jeremiah Wright doesn’t even stand a chance to be remotely understood if only about 25% of white liberals think that blacks are intelligent at school.  That means 75% think WE’RE NOT!! 

I’m quite sure that these numbers are skewed to some extent, but come on now, there’s some level of truth to this.  I mean, the fact that less than half of whites think highly of blacks means there’s a problem.  That’s why I fall out with some of the commenters–maybe–I’m not sure, was I damned before I wrote my opinions?  It seems as though black thought is still considered a novelty and some fringe thought in the field of academia.

Omg…

Only approximately 12% of white Republicans interviewed said that blacks were law-abiding.  WTF?!?!?!  And still there are more black males in college than are in the prison system.  WTF!?!?!  ARE THESE PEOPLE SERIOUS!  Yet again, white ignorance and innocence provides white people with the privilege of seeing black folk through this light.  Of course, if I’m a white suburbanite or a white person living in a rural area, when the few times I see blacks on television they’re getting arrested or something.  Just now, my friend down in Houston was telling me that they seemingly found the most county-bumpkin ass black folk to interview.

Not to mention the Leprachaun found in Mobile.

Well, why would white folk think blacks are intelligent if this news clip has been circulated in repeat almost as much as Jeremiah Wright clips this spring, and even still gets mentioned on VH1.  Of course at best, 30% of white liberals thought we were good at everyday things–so I think we’re all free to interpret the opposite of such a poll.

That’s why it was easy for the columnist of the Dallas Morning News in my previous post to make the statement that he did that Josh Howard and his ilk of “ghetto culture” are “Segregationist” or dare say “separatist” from the “values and ideals of America”: that’s because whites historically have separated us!  Prior to blacks being blacks, back when were African slaves, to the inception of this country, through slavery, through Jim Crow and until now, whites have made us seperate.  We’ve NEVER been fully accepted in this country, for all this talk about the unity of the races, it was unity only seen on the terms of dominant culture–which we as blacks are not.  We are in fact the dominant subordinate culture–the group that not only has our own culture that has existed from Day 1 under the radar of a white ruling class, but also the dominant subordinate culture that in order to survive has had to learn about the ruling culture and be able to move between the two fluidly lest being called “too white” by one, and “too black” by the other.

Y’all just don’t know how much this is upsetting me.

I think blacks have more than done their fair share of reconcilliation and this is the effing thanks we get–only 24% of whites view blacks as friendly.  We’re the only people in frickin’ world history who were an enslaved people and didn’t rise up en masse and whoop whitey’s ass (good ol’ Nat Turner didn’t even make it out the county in his cleansing crusade back in 1831).  Blacks gave you the best apologists our race could offer in the form of Frederick Douglass, Booker T. Washington, W.E.B. DuBois, Martin Luther King (who y’all didn’t like and only let history tell a different story)

And we still didn’t whoop ass and take names!

The AP-Yahoo News poll used the unique methodology of Knowledge Networks, a Menlo Park, Calif., firm that interviews people online after randomly selecting and screening them over telephone. Numerous studies have shown that people are more likely to report embarrassing behavior and unpopular opinions when answering questions on a computer rather than talking to a stranger.

Other techniques used in the poll included recording people’s responses to black or white faces flashed on a computer screen, asking participants to rate how well certain adjectives apply to blacks, measuring whether people believe blacks’ troubles are their own fault, and simply asking people how much they like or dislike blacks.

“We still don’t like black people,” said John Clouse, 57, reflecting the sentiments of his pals gathered at a coffee shop in Somerset, Ohio.

Given a choice of several positive and negative adjectives that might describe blacks, 20 percent of all whites said the word “violent” strongly applied. Among other words, 22 percent agreed with “boastful,” 29 percent “complaining,” 13 percent “lazy” and 11 percent “irresponsible.” When asked about positive adjectives, whites were more likely to stay on the fence than give a strongly positive assessment.

Among white Democrats, one third cited a negative adjective and, of those, 58 percent said they planned to back Obama.

The poll sought to measure latent prejudices among whites by asking about factors contributing to the state of black America. One finding: More than a quarter of white Democrats agree that “if blacks would only try harder, they could be just as well off as whites.”

Those who agreed with that statement were much less likely to back Obama than those who didn’t.

Among white independents, racial stereotyping is not uncommon. For example, while about 20 percent of independent voters called blacks “intelligent” or “smart,” more than one third latched on the adjective “complaining” and 24 percent said blacks were “violent.”

Nearly four in 10 white independents agreed that blacks would be better off if they “try harder.”

The survey broke ground by incorporating images of black and white faces to measure implicit racial attitudes, or prejudices that are so deeply rooted that people may not realize they have them. That test suggested the incidence of racial prejudice is even higher, with more than half of whites revealing more negative feelings toward blacks than whites.

Researchers used mathematical modeling to sort out the relative impact of a huge swath of variables that might have an impact on people’s votes — including race, ideology, party identification, the hunger for change and the sentiments of Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton’s backers.

Just 59 percent of her white Democratic supporters said they wanted Obama to be president. Nearly 17 percent of Clinton’s white backers plan to vote for McCain.

Oh my God…

I’m done, this is just out of order on so many ways it’s not even funny.  I wonder just what white Independents, Democrats, well…Republicans are damn near a lost cause…did they interview to have such a skewed view of us.  I mean, not one of those numbers reached the 50% mark in either direction be it a postivie word or a negative word, which pretty much says that whites are in universal agreement in their less than glowing view of those of the African American race.

If blacks took the same survey and didn’t give a glowing review of white America, then there would be outrage from white folk much like it was after Jeremiah Wright and even after Rev. Jesse Jackson and his castration comment and we heard all this CRAP about post-racial this and that.

That’s a load a bull.

**goes searching for a shovel**

Are you just as outraged as I am or, have you been living under the equally sedative understanding that we had at least come a bit farther in this country than this?  I don’t whether to be outraged or sad or should I move up my search for overseas programs and move out the country next year.  I’d LOVE to hear your comments on this one.  Do you think this polling is indicative of blacks own behaviours (I’m sure that’s the easy answer because it would absolve whites of any wrong doing and being nothing more than benevolent masters) or is this polling a result of whites and their own unconfronted prejudices that manifest in the weirdest ways resulting in blacks going the hell off on them at work or something and then whites don’t even know what happened (just ask my host mother from this summer when she said “Hip hop is from the prison culture” I had to tell militant and angry Negro to go on vacation momentarily).

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

The Uppity Negro Manifesto: A Black Nationalist Response to Post-Racial Fatigue

20 Sep

Either a) I’m really getting caught up with other blog posts or b) I’m just getting lazy because this blogging while in grad school thing isn’t easy.

I’m going with b)

Yeah, I’m somewhat stealing a story, but it’s more a theme that I happened upon while making a comment on another blog.  The Dallas Morning News reported yesterday that Dallas Mavericks’ player Josh Howard made some off-color comments as to why he didn’t stand during a flag-football game sponsored by Allen Iverson.

Wow.

Um, we all know A.I. is an NBA badboy, Howard, perhaps not so much on the national arena, personally I wasn’t aware of his limit-pushing escapades off the court, but nonetheless, that was a harsh comment even for my book.  The article quotes Mark Cuban as saying that “we will be going through some advanced communication-skill sessions together this training camp.”  And then goes on to say “Josh really is a good guy with a great heart.  He just doesn’t do a good job of showing that side of himself publicly.”

Well isn’t that the understatement of the decade.

Well, I just went off in the post and ended with the same message that many whites say to blacks when a Josh Howard comment is caught on camera which was “SHUT THE HELL UP!”

Sorry, I’m being angry Negro today.

But, my anger was somewhat assuaged when I clicked on a link from the original Morning News article entitled “Josh Howard off-key on Black patriotism.”

In a back and forth, manuscript-style dual columnist conversation concerning Howard’s comments, two Morning News columinist re-hash the incident.  There was the mention of Dyson’s April 24th, 2008 Time interview when he separated “nationalism” and “patriotism” both of which come from a love of country in the context of Jeremiah Wright and using the Dyson standby that many blacks are patriotic by definition because we’ve ALWAYS been involved in fighting this country’s wars in the military from Civil War and on–paying what many patriots define as the “ultimate sacrifice.”

But it was the following passage that got my mental gears turning.

Steve: I’m sure you’re right that no one looks to Josh Howard as spokesman for the African-American community. But his words didn’t spring from nowhere. His statement was rooted in something.

I hate to say this, but I almost see a segregationist attitude rising up among some young blacks. Or maybe “separatist” is a better word. It’s like he and some others are just not comfortable fully embracing the values and ideals of America. [emphasis added]

The celebration of ghetto culture feels like a rejection of mainstream America. And for those of us who have long yearned for racial unity, it hurts to be pushed away – even if it’s “just” Josh Howard giving the stiff arm.

Well, no doubt that Steve Blow is a white columnist and that James Ragland is black.  I don’t think their bios mean much in the grand scheme of things, but be my guest if you want to check them out.  But, first I’d wonder what Blow’s take is on Tim Wise’s latest blog at the RedRoom on white privilege that got copied and pasted on many a black blogs, including this one.

But it’s Blow’s mentality that a) proves white privilege exists and b) I think is ultimately detrimental to our country’s progress.

Certain mindsets, that cross politcal lines, but rarely racial ones, would say exactly what Blow would say and see nothing wrong with it.  Aside from the weirdness of hearing a white guy talk about “ghetto culture” it’s the idea that black people are not inline with “the values and ideals of America.”

Militant Negro will say without any reservations: “This is some bull$#!%!  I have a right to resist against the tyrannies of the prevailing thought in this country. ‘Power concedes nothing without a demand.  It never did and it never will.  Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have found out the exact measure of injustice and wrong which will be imposed upon them, and these will continue till they are resisted with either words or blows, or with both’ and you’d better pray I choose the former and not the latter!”

Angry Negro really wants to say “Why should we subscribe to anything that dominant culture [read: white folks who wield political and economic power, which ultimately dictates social power]?  It is this dominant culture that a) lead to our ancestors enslavement b) that lead to the prevailing understanding of “seperate but equal” (I’m coming to that in a minute) c) that has lead to a consumerist culture that has preyed on the economically impoverished many of which are in the black community.  I mean what the hell else do y’all want from us?  I mean Chris Howard, even with a degree is a prime example of the pimp-prostitute farm that is the NBA!  I mean, he’s making y’all RICH!  So shut the hell up and let him look a fool!”

Uppity Negro simply says at the press conference: “Why is it that black ideals and values aren’t American in the first place?  Were we not here long before the Irish, the Germans, the Polish and the Jews?  Did not the Anglo-Saxon’s have us in mind when they framed the Constitution?  I mean most certainly if it were not for blacks in this country, these values and ideals would not have been in place.  I mean seriously, could you imagine this country without blacks, African Americans–or whatever it is we’re calling ourselves these days.

“If it weren’t for blacks would we have had a 3/5ths compromise in the Constitution?  If it weren’t for blacks would we have had the top three of four major Supreme Court decisions centered around race: The Dred Scott Decision of 1857, the Plessy Vs. Ferguson Decision of 1896 and the Brown vs. The Topeka Board of Education in 1954 (with Roe vs. Wade being the the fourth, non race related case).  Seriously, if it wasn’t for the Civil Rights Act and Voting Rights Act of 1964 and 1965 respectively, how could these “values and ideals of America” have been shaped in the first place?”

I’ve heard many a professor, preacher and black adult opine that “Integration was the worst thing to have happened to the black community.”  Real talk, prior to integration blacks had be self-sufficient: we owned our own stores because of the horrible treatment we received in many white ones, we owned our own banks, we circulated the money in our own community, we supported our on schools and the teachers actually gave a damn because they lived on the same block–not some suburban plant. 

What most of these older adults have said that we should have been de-segregationist in our approach.  I mean the inane hatred of whites against blacks during the Jim Crow era was so strong that they passed laws about it.  There should have been no law that said a black person couldn’t eat at a lunch counter, but fact of the matter is, why did blacks want to eat food from that lunch counter in the first place?

Well, that’s an open question…

Seriously, for all this talk about being post-racial and bringing blacks and whites together is under the assumption of how whites interpret we need to be brought together.  Why is it that my understanding is the wrong understanding?  Why is it “off-key black patriotism” and not just “off-key patriotism?”  Does patriotism have to be qualified in terms of blackness–why not white patriotism?  Just look the comments following the article in the Morning News and the Youtube clip and many of them put forth the advice for those of the darker skin color to just be quiet–but using a much smaller word base to put get their point across.

So, why is it that I’m in the wrong if I were to tell all of them to “Shut the Hell up!” 

Serious question–why is it that everytime a black person voices their opinion, if it’s not in lockstep with another prevailing white understanding then it’s branded as separatist or the trump card of “unpatriotic” or “un-American?”  What’s wrong with having a philosophy and an ideology or even a theology that celebrates ones culture, as opposed to being merely tolerated by another.

Don’t forget to check out the other posts:

Keep it uppity and keep it truthfully radical, JLL

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 104 other followers